Originally Posted by: PoleraI understand the goal of making a better product etc. for instance fixing a problem or improving weak points, but when you revoice and improve all channels, thats a major difference. I essentially feel as though i paid to be a test and feeback resource for thier company, and that they sold a "rush" job. Goes to show, no one can beat the classics...time tested acceptance and approval.
Remarketing an old product is such an old and dirty tactic, it's become acceptable unfortunately to use it although to varying degrees. Take for instance the Mesa Mark III blue stripe. They replace the power section on the first channel with a power section just like the one out of Mark IIC+ And that feeling you have about being a test subject.... you are. I worked for a corporate hotel chain. I can tell you from experience that almost every company will follow customer trends just to make a buck. It's common sense, but it doesn't leave much to integrity depending on how you look at it. I mean yes Mesa amps are almost always good quality, but they themselves constantly try to reproduce the amps of the past. So does Marshall. Both of those companies put out reissues of their old amps. Peavey doesn't really try to recreate amps, but they do follow trends. Fender, well I'm not sure what they do. (The amp companies of course make new amps also though) That's why most musicians are different from the companies that create the products they use. While people run businesses mainly to make money, musicians usually don't write songs to make money. Song writers do, but don't get me started on those people. Well now I'm getting into a rant that could go a full three or four pages on people being greedy and then I'd be on my soapbox. I think I'll just say, it's sad that you are a test subject for companies as are the rest of us, but that's how they make their money. I agree with you though. It's not very nice, but necessary.