View post (Alice in chains is better than nirvana)

View thread

tehplatypus
Registered User
Joined: 10/31/04
Posts: 531
tehplatypus
Registered User
Joined: 10/31/04
Posts: 531
08/10/2006 5:15 am
alice in chains and nirvana are different.


nirvana grew up more in punk and some heavy metal and alice in chains were a glam band at one point(hence the name).


that being said...i like both for different reasons...and if you can listen to in utero and alice in chains' self titled and see any reason why they should be compared other than they were around at the same, you're musically impotent. other than them both having junkies and distorted guitars, they're nothing alike.


edit: upon looking up on wikipedia, it says that alice n chainz was supposed to be layne's speed metal band....but i remember jerry talking about some glam band pre-aic in an interview around the time boggy depot was coming out.
okay...my post is done...goodbye.